CinemaSerf
May 30, 2024
4/10
I gave this 4/10 because I believe that there were a lot more creative processes involved with this, than those which immediately manifested themselves onto the screen. The cinematography, for example, is doubtless a collaborative attempt by some in the production team to do all they can to distract us all from the truly abysmal acting. That's got to be worth some plaudits. The music isn't exactly rousing and crescendo-like, but that, I am sure, is because Alan Deacon did not want to unduly disturb the audience from their well earned slumbers - again, plaudits where they are due. Otherwise, this is a shocking waste of time (and Maltesers). I would add spoilers, but if I had to suffer through this, I don't see why anyone else should get off lightly.
